2017
Mease K, Kimzey A , Lansita J. 2017. Biomarkers for nonclinical infusion reactions in marketed biotherapeutics and considerations for study design. Curr Opin Toxicol 4(June):1–15; doi: 10.1016/j.cotox.2017.03.005 . PMID: 29658009.
View Abstract
Topics: biomarkers
Borghoff SJ , Ring C, Banton M, Leavens TL. 2017. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for ethyl tertiary-butyl ether and tertiary-butyl alcohol in rats: Contribution of binding to a2u-globulin in male rats and high-exposure nonlinear kinetics to toxicity and cancer outcomes. J Appl Toxicol 37(5):621-640; doi: 10.1002/jat.3412 . PMID: 27885692.
View Abstract
Topics: modeling , pharmacokinetics
Greene T, Rogers S, Franzen A , Gentry R. 2017. A critical review of the literature to conduct a toxicity assessment for oral exposure to methyl salicylate. Crit Rev Toxicol 47(2):98–120; doi: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1236071 . PMID: 27834107.
View Abstract
Topics: benchmark dose estimation (BMD) , Exposure Assessment , food additives , mode of action
Fitzpatrick J, Patlewicz G . 2017. Application of IATA – A case study in evaluating the global and local performance of a Bayesian network model for skin sensitization. SAR QSAR Environ Res 28(4):297-310; doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2017.1311941 . PMID: 28423913.
View Abstract
Topics: Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) , Bayesian modeling
Fitzpatrick JM, Roberts DW, Patlewicz G . 2017. What determines skin sensitization potency–Myths, maybes and realities. The 500 molecular weight cut-off – An updated analysis. J Appl Toxicol 37(1):105-116; doi: 10.1002/jat.3348 . PMID: 27283458.
View Abstract
Topics: Exposure Assessment
Fitzpatrick JM, Roberts DW, Patlewicz G . 2017. Is skin penetration a determining factor in skin sensitization potential and potency? Refuting the notion of a LogKow threshold for skin sensitization. J Appl Toxicol 37(1):117-127; doi: 10.1002/jat.3354 . PMID: 27357739.
View Abstract
Topics: Exposure Assessment
Lea IA , Gong H, Paleja A, Rashid, A, Foster J. 2017. CEBS: A comprehensive annotated database of toxicological data. Nucleic Acids Res 45(D1):D964–D971; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1077 . PMID: 27899660.
View Abstract
Topics: computational toxicology
2016
Thompson CM , Bichteler A, Rager JE, Suh M , Proctor DM, Haws LC, Harris MA. 2016. Comparison of in vivo genotoxic and carcinogenic potency to augment mode of action analysis: Case study with hexavalent chromium. Mut Res/Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 800-801(April):28-34; doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.01.008 .
View Abstract
Topics: carcinogens , chromium , mode of action
Patlewicz G , Casati S, Basketter D, Asturiol D, Roberts DW, Lepoittevin J-P, Aschberger K. 2016. Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro haptens relevant for skin sensitization? Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 82(10):147-155;p doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.08.007 . PMID: 27569201.
View Abstract
Topics: Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs)
Thompson CM , Rager JE, Suh M , Ring CL, Proctor DM, Haws LC, Fry RC, Harris MA. 2016. Transcriptomic responses in the oral cavity of F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice following exposure to Cr(VI): Implications for risk assessment. Environ Molec Mutagen 57(9):706-716; doi: 10.1002/em.22064 . PMID: 27859739.
View Abstract